UHD Graphics 750 vs Radeon HD 8570D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8570D and UHD Graphics 750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8570D
2013
65 Watt
1.12

UHD Graphics 750 outperforms HD 8570D by a whopping 297% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1088671
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.2020.59
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteRocket Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 July 2013 (11 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256256
Core clock speed800 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed868 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate13.8920.80
Floating-point processing power0.4444 TFLOPS0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPRing Bus
WidthIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8570D 1.12
UHD Graphics 750 4.45
+297%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8570D 436
UHD Graphics 750 1733
+297%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−285%
50−55
+285%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Atomic Heart 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Atomic Heart 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Battlefield 5 0−1 16−18
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Fortnite 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Valorant 30−35
−75%
55−60
+75%
Atomic Heart 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Battlefield 5 0−1 16−18
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−188%
75−80
+188%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Dota 2 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Fortnite 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
−133%
14−16
+133%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Valorant 30−35
−75%
55−60
+75%
Battlefield 5 0−1 16−18
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Dota 2 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Valorant 30−35
−75%
55−60
+75%
Fortnite 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−433%
30−35
+433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Valorant 2−3
−2200%
45−50
+2200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Fortnite 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Atomic Heart 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Fortnite 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how HD 8570D and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is 285% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 2200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 43 tests (78%)
  • there's a draw in 12 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.12 4.45
Recency 10 July 2013 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has a 297.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8570D in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8570D
Radeon HD 8570D
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2
100 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8570D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6
407 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8570D or UHD Graphics 750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.