ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs HD 8570D
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 8570D with Mobility Radeon HD 4850, including specs and performance data.
Mobility HD 4850 outperforms HD 8570D by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1160 | 1021 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.16 | no data |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) | TeraScale (2005−2013) |
| GPU code name | Devastator Lite | M98 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 10 July 2013 (12 years ago) | 9 January 2009 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 256 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 868 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,303 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 13.89 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.4444 TFLOPS | 0.8 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16 |
| TMUs | 16 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 850 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 54.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 13
−215%
| 41
+215%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Fortnite | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−50%
|
9−10
+50%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−12.9%
|
35−40
+12.9%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 24−27
−32%
|
30−35
+32%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−20%
|
18−20
+20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Fortnite | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−50%
|
9−10
+50%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−12.9%
|
35−40
+12.9%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−20%
|
18−20
+20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−50%
|
9−10
+50%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−12.9%
|
35−40
+12.9%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−50%
|
14−16
+50%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Valorant | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
This is how HD 8570D and ATI Mobility HD 4850 compete in popular games:
- ATI Mobility HD 4850 is 215% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 8570D is 500% faster.
- in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the ATI Mobility HD 4850 is 400% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- HD 8570D performs better in 1 test (2%)
- ATI Mobility HD 4850 performs better in 34 tests (69%)
- there's a draw in 14 tests (29%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.98 | 1.50 |
| Recency | 10 July 2013 | 9 January 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 55 nm |
HD 8570D has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 71.9% more advanced lithography process.
ATI Mobility HD 4850, on the other hand, has a 53.1% higher aggregate performance score.
The Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8570D in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 8570D is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
