Quadro4 380 XGL vs Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics with Quadro4 380 XGL, including specs and performance data.

HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics
2013
2.54
+25300%

HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics outperforms Quadro4 380 XGL by a whopping 25300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8631560
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataCelsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameno dataNV18 A4
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 August 2013 (12 years ago)12 November 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed720 / 825 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistorsno data29 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.100
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz256 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8.192 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX118.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8 0−1
Fortnite 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1
Valorant 40−45 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 24−27 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8 0−1
Fortnite 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 6−7 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 0−1
Valorant 40−45 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 24−27 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 0−1
Valorant 40−45 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 12−14 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 0−1
Valorant 21−24 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 12−14 0−1

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.54 0.01
Recency 1 August 2013 12 November 2002
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics has a 25300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro4 380 XGL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Quadro4 380 XGL is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA Quadro4 380 XGL
Quadro4 380 XGL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 28 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8550G HD 8750M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 290 votes

Rate Quadro4 380 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics or Quadro4 380 XGL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.