CMP 30HX vs Radeon HD 8510G

Place in the ranking	1123	263
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	22.61
Power efficiency	1.87	11.68
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Devastator	TU116
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	23 May 2013 (11 years ago)	25 February 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	1408
Core clock speed	554 MHz	1530 MHz
Boost clock speed	720 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	1,303 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	125 Watt
Texture fill rate	17.28	157.1
Floating-point processing power	0.553 TFLOPS	5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	48
TMUs	24	88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x4
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	6 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.6
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8510G 0.95

CMP 30HX 21.17
+2128%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8510G 365

CMP 30HX 8135
+2129%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −2043%	150−160 +2043%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2025%	85−90 +2025%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −2043%	150−160 +2043%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2025%	85−90 +2025%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −2025%	170−180 +2025%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −2067%	130−140 +2067%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −2043%	150−160 +2043%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2025%	85−90 +2025%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −2122%	200−210 +2122%
Fortnite	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −2025%	170−180 +2025%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −2082%	240−250 +2082%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −2067%	130−140 +2067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −2067%	130−140 +2067%
World of Tanks	21−24 −2074%	500−550 +2074%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −2043%	150−160 +2043%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2025%	85−90 +2025%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −2122%	200−210 +2122%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −2025%	170−180 +2025%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −2082%	240−250 +2082%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −2100%	110−120 +2100%
World of Tanks	4−5 −2025%	85−90 +2025%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −1997%	650−700 +1997%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −2100%	110−120 +2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −2025%	85−90 +2025%
Valorant	6−7 −2067%	130−140 +2067%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −1900%	300−310 +1900%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −1900%	300−310 +1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −1900%	40−45 +1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −1900%	300−310 +1900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1900%	40−45 +1900%
Dota 2	14−16 −1900%	300−310 +1900%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Valorant	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.95	21.17
Recency	23 May 2013	25 February 2021
Chip lithography	32 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	125 Watt

HD 8510G has 257.1% lower power consumption.

CMP 30HX, on the other hand, has a 2128.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The CMP 30HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8510G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8510G is a notebook card while CMP 30HX is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.