Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs HD 8450G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1196not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.75no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameScrapperTahiti
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)31 January 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192768
Core clock speed533 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate8.64038.40
Floating-point processing power0.2765 TFLOPS1.229 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs1248
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared3 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data240.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 31 January 2012
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 85 Watt

HD 8450G has an age advantage of 1 year, and 142.9% lower power consumption.

HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8450G and Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8450G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8450G
Radeon HD 8450G
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 18 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8450G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8450G or Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.