Radeon HD 8310E vs HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.49
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameTahitiKalindi
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 January 2012 (13 years ago)23 April 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768128
Core clock speed800 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate38.402.400
Floating-point processing power1.229 TFLOPS0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs488
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount3 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth240.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2012 23 April 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 25 Watt

HD 8310E has an age advantage of 1 year, and 240% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 and Radeon HD 8310E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 8310E is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
AMD Radeon HD 8310E
Radeon HD 8310E

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 30 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8310E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 or Radeon HD 8310E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.