UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs Radeon HD 8410G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8180 8210 8210E 8240 Mobile IGP 8250 8280 Mobile IGP 8280E 8310E 8310G 8330 Mobile IGP 8330E 8350G 8400 Mobile IGP 8400E 8410G 8450G 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics 8510G 8530M 8550G 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics 8550M 8570A 8570M 8590M 8610G 8610G IGP 8650G 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 8650M 8670A 8670M 8690M 8730A 8730M 8750A 8750M 8770M 8790M 8830M 8850M 8870M 8950M 8970M 8970M Crossfire
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
G1 G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) G1 32EU Mobile G4 G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) G4 48EU Mobile G7 G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) G7 64EU Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8410G and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8410G
2013
35 Watt
1.04

Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) outperforms HD 8410G by a whopping 177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
HD 8410G HD 8410G
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1138817
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.288.85
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameScrapperIce Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)28 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19232
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate8.640no data
Floating-point processing power0.2765 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR4
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−225%
13
+225%
4K3−4
−200%
9
+200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−450%
11
+450%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Fortnite 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Valorant 30−35
−43.8%
45−50
+43.8%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−15.4%
30
+15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Dota 2 14−16
−46.7%
22
+46.7%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Fortnite 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−66.7%
10
+66.7%
Valorant 30−35
−43.8%
45−50
+43.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Dota 2 14−16
−33.3%
20
+33.3%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5
−20%
Valorant 30−35
−43.8%
45−50
+43.8%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−267%
21−24
+267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%
Valorant 1−2
−2700%
27−30
+2700%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Valorant 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 17
+0%
17
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16
+0%
16
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4
+0%
4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
+0%
7
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9
+0%
9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how HD 8410G and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 225% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 8410G is 20% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 2700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 8410G performs better in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) performs better in 42 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 12 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.04 2.88
Recency 23 May 2013 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 12 Watt

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has a 176.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 191.7% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8410G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon HD 8410G
Radeon HD 8410G
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD 8410G Radeon HD 8410G
vs
GT 710M GeForce GT 710M
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630
HD 8410G Radeon HD 8410G
vs
GT 620M GeForce GT 620M
HD 7470M AMD HD 7470M
vs
Tesla X2070 X2070
HD 7470M AMD HD 7470M
vs
7600 GS AGP 7600 GS AGP
HD 7470M AMD HD 7470M
vs
RTX A1000 A1000
HD 8410G AMD HD 8410G
vs
HD 8250 8250
HD 8410G AMD HD 8410G
vs
HD Graphics 2500 2500
HD 8400 AMD HD 8400
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3410 3410
HD 8400 AMD HD 8400
vs
R5 340X OEM 340X OEM
HD 8400 AMD HD 8400
vs
ATI HD 3570 3570
HD 8400 AMD HD 8400
vs
ATI HD 3550 3550
HD 8400 AMD HD 8400
vs
ATI HD 3450 AGP 3450 AGP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 8410G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 395 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8410G or UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.