TITAN RTX vs Radeon HD 8410G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8410G with TITAN RTX, including specs and performance data.

HD 8410G
2013
35 Watt
0.97

TITAN RTX outperforms HD 8410G by a whopping 4251% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking109572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.12
Power efficiency2.2011.96
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameScrapperTU102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)18 December 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1924608
Core clock speed600 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt280 Watt
Texture fill rate8.640509.8
Floating-point processing power0.2765 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs12288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8410G 0.97
TITAN RTX 42.20
+4251%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8410G 435
TITAN RTX 18858
+4235%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−5267%
161
+5267%
1440p2−3
−5000%
102
+5000%
4K1−2
−7200%
73
+7200%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data15.52
1440pno data24.50
4Kno data34.23

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−8700%
264
+8700%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3850%
79
+3850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−6500%
198
+6500%
Battlefield 5 0−1 163
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3850%
79
+3850%
Fortnite 2−3
−8350%
169
+8350%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−3017%
187
+3017%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−2144%
202
+2144%
Valorant 30−35
−988%
348
+988%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−3833%
118
+3833%
Battlefield 5 0−1 164
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−1012%
270−280
+1012%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3850%
79
+3850%
Dota 2 14−16
−933%
155
+933%
Fortnite 2−3
−8700%
176
+8700%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−3000%
186
+3000%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−13300%
134
+13300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1711%
163
+1711%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−5240%
267
+5240%
Valorant 30−35
−950%
336
+950%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 160
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3800%
78
+3800%
Dota 2 14−16
−887%
148
+887%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2817%
175
+2817%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1411%
136
+1411%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2680%
139
+2680%
Valorant 30−35
−638%
236
+638%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−6600%
134
+6600%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−5167%
300−350
+5167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1650%
170−180
+1650%
Valorant 2−3
−15250%
307
+15250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6500%
66
+6500%
Far Cry 5 0−1 134
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5133%
157
+5133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−6050%
120−130
+6050%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 35−40
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−793%
134
+793%
Valorant 6−7
−4900%
300
+4900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 33
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7900%
80
+7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4700%
96
+4700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3600%
74
+3600%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 353
+0%
353
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 342
+0%
342
+0%
Far Cry 5 165
+0%
165
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 168
+0%
168
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 270
+0%
270
+0%
Far Cry 5 156
+0%
156
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 153
+0%
153
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 152
+0%
152
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 146
+0%
146
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 157
+0%
157
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 114
+0%
114
+0%
Metro Exodus 85
+0%
85
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 97
+0%
97
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Dota 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+0%
114
+0%

This is how HD 8410G and TITAN RTX compete in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is 5267% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX is 5000% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN RTX is 7200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the TITAN RTX is 15250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is ahead in 37 tests (65%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (35%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 42.20
Recency 23 May 2013 18 December 2018
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 280 Watt

HD 8410G has 700% lower power consumption.

TITAN RTX, on the other hand, has a 4250.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8410G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8410G is a notebook card while TITAN RTX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8410G
Radeon HD 8410G
NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 8410G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 825 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8410G or TITAN RTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.