TITAN RTX vs Radeon HD 8410G

Place in the ranking	1082	64
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	7.82
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Trinity	TU102
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	23 May 2013 (11 years ago)	18 December 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	4608
Core clock speed	450 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	600 MHz	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	1,303 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	280 Watt
Texture fill rate	8.640	509.8
Floating-point processing power	0.2765 gflops	16.31 gflops
ROPs	4	96
TMUs	12	288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	24 GB
Memory bus width	no data	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	672.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.5
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8410G 1.13

TITAN RTX 48.90
+4227%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8410G 435

TITAN RTX 18858
+4235%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	3−4 −5333%	163 +5333%
1440p	2−3 −5150%	105 +5150%
4K	1−2 −7300%	74 +7300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−2533%

79
+2533%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −1980%	104 +1980%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −3475%	143 +3475%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2533%	79 +2533%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −12600%	127 +12600%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −9950%	201 +9950%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −28000%	281 +28000%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2240%	117 +2240%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −2577%	348 +2577%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −12600%	127 +12600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −2843%	206 +2843%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −572%	215 +572%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −3620%	186 +3620%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −3175%	131 +3175%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2533%	79 +2533%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −10000%	101 +10000%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −7600%	154 +7600%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −25300%	254 +25300%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2220%	116 +2220%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −2485%	336 +2485%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −10900%	110 +10900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −3986%	286 +3986%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −818%	100−110 +818%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −538%	204 +538%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −1480%	79 +1480%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2450%	102 +2450%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2500%	78 +2500%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −7800%	79 +7800%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −17400%	175 +17400%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2120%	111 +2120%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −1577%	218 +1577%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −3357%	242 +3357%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1164%	139 +1164%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −169%	86 +169%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−12200%

123
+12200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −9700%	95−100 +9700%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −3650%	75−80 +3650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −5300%	50−55 +5300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −6500%	66 +6500%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −5600%	55−60 +5600%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1329%	100 +1329%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −4100%	168 +4100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	75−80
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −4000%	205 +4000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−2875%

119
+2875%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −5100%	52 +5100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	43
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	50
Far Cry 5	0−1	49

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−3600%

74
+3600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	104 +0%	104 +0%
Battlefield 5	209 +0%	209 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	88 +0%	88 +0%
Battlefield 5	203 +0%	203 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	66 +0%	66 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	79 +0%	79 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +0%	250−260 +0%
Metro Exodus	114 +0%	114 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	183 +0%	183 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	88 +0%	88 +0%
Hitman 3	48 +0%	48 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150 +0%	150 +0%
Metro Exodus	121 +0%	121 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	103 +0%	103 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	33 +0%	33 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	114 +0%	114 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	109 +0%	109 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	43 +0%	43 +0%

This is how HD 8410G and TITAN RTX compete in popular games:

TITAN RTX is 5333% faster in 1080p
TITAN RTX is 5150% faster in 1440p
TITAN RTX is 7300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the TITAN RTX is 28000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

TITAN RTX is ahead in 46 tests (69%)
there's a draw in 21 test (31%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.13	48.90
Recency	23 May 2013	18 December 2018
Chip lithography	32 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	280 Watt

HD 8410G has 700% lower power consumption.

TITAN RTX, on the other hand, has a 4227.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8410G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8410G is a notebook card while TITAN RTX is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.