Radeon 680M vs HD 8410G

Place in the ranking	1077	336
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.25	22.29
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Scrapper	Rembrandt+
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	23 May 2013 (11 years ago)	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	768
Core clock speed	600 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	720 MHz	2200 MHz
Number of transistors	1,303 million	13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	8.640	105.6
Floating-point processing power	0.2765 TFLOPS	3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	32
TMUs	12	48
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.7
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8410G 1.13

Radeon 680M 15.99
+1315%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8410G 435

Radeon 680M 6166
+1317%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	2−3 −1750%	37 +1750%
1440p	1−2 −1600%	17 +1600%
4K	0−1	11

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−1200%

39
+1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −680%	35−40 +680%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −867%	29 +867%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4000%	40−45 +4000%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −2250%	45−50 +2250%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −10900%	110−120 +10900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −540%	32 +540%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −562%	85−90 +562%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −4600%	45−50 +4600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −714%	55−60 +714%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −166%	85−90 +166%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −680%	35−40 +680%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −600%	21 +600%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4000%	40−45 +4000%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −2250%	45−50 +2250%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −10900%	110−120 +10900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −500%	30 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −562%	85−90 +562%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −4600%	45−50 +4600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −571%	47 +571%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −166%	85−90 +166%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −680%	35−40 +680%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −467%	17 +467%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4000%	40−45 +4000%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −10900%	110−120 +10900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −440%	27 +440%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −231%	43 +231%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −471%	40 +471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −118%	24 +118%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +77.8%	18 −77.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−4600%

45−50
+4600%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −3200%	30−35 +3200%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −1250%	27−30 +1250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1000%	11 +1000%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%
Hitman 3	7−8 −186%	20−22 +186%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	17
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −2000%	100−110 +2000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−625%

27−30
+625%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

12−14

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	8−9
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	9−10
Far Cry 5	0−1	9−10

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−650%

14−16
+650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 +0%	38 +0%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	31 +0%	31 +0%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27 +0%	27 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 +0%	13 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	4 +0%	4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14 +0%	14 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

This is how HD 8410G and Radeon 680M compete in popular games:

Radeon 680M is 1750% faster in 1080p
Radeon 680M is 1600% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 8410G is 78% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 680M is 10900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

HD 8410G is ahead in 1 test (1%)
Radeon 680M is ahead in 45 tests (67%)
there's a draw in 21 test (31%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.13	15.99
Recency	23 May 2013	3 January 2023
Chip lithography	32 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	50 Watt

HD 8410G has 42.9% lower power consumption.

Radeon 680M, on the other hand, has a 1315% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 433.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 680M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8410G in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.