Iris Plus Graphics 930 vs Radeon HD 8410G

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1077not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.25no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameScrapperIce Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192256
Core clock speed600 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate8.64016.00
Floating-point processing power0.2765 TFLOPS0.512 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 930 has a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8410G and Iris Plus Graphics 930. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8410G is a notebook card while Iris Plus Graphics 930 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8410G
Radeon HD 8410G
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 930
Iris Plus Graphics 930

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 8410G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.