GeForce 9600 GTX vs Radeon HD 8330E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1246not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.23no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameKalindiG92
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 April 2013 (12 years ago)27 May 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12896
Core clock speed497 MHz580 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate3.97627.84
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPS0.2784 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs848
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data44.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.34.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2013 27 May 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 140 Watt

HD 8330E has an age advantage of 3 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 833.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8330E and GeForce 9600 GTX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8330E is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9600 GTX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8330E
Radeon HD 8330E
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GTX
GeForce 9600 GTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8330E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 16 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8330E or GeForce 9600 GTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.