Radeon HD 8210E vs GeForce 9600 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1300
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.93
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameG92Kalindi
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 May 2009 (16 years ago)23 April 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96128
Core clock speed580 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors754 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt9 Watt
Texture fill rate27.842.400
Floating-point processing power0.2784 TFLOPS0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs488
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2009 23 April 2013
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 9 Watt

HD 8210E has an age advantage of 3 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 1455.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600 GTX and Radeon HD 8210E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9600 GTX is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 8210E is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GTX
GeForce 9600 GTX
AMD Radeon HD 8210E
Radeon HD 8210E

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 16 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 26 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600 GTX or Radeon HD 8210E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.