GeForce GTX 980MX vs Radeon HD 8330

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1238not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.38no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameKalindiGM204
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 August 2013 (12 years ago)1 June 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281664
Core clock speed497 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1178 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt148 Watt
Texture fill rate3.976122.5
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPS3.92 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8104
L1 Cacheno data624 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2013 1 June 2016
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 148 Watt

HD 8330 has 886.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 980MX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8330 and GeForce GTX 980MX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8330 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 980MX is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8330
Radeon HD 8330
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX
GeForce GTX 980MX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 215 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 30 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8330 or GeForce GTX 980MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.