GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 8330

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1238not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.38no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameKalindiGM107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 August 2013 (12 years ago)13 March 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128640
Core clock speed497 MHz993 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1124 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate3.97644.96
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPS1.439 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs840
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPMXM-B (3.0)
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2013 13 March 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

HD 8330 has 400% lower power consumption.

GTX 950M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8330 and GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8330 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8330
Radeon HD 8330
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 215 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8330 or GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.