L20 vs Radeon HD 8310E

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1125not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.45no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameKalindiAD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 April 2013 (11 years ago)16 November 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12811776
Core clock speed300 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400927.4
Floating-point processing power0.0768 TFLOPS59.35 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8368
Tensor Coresno data368
Ray Tracing Coresno data92

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data864.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2013 16 November 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 275 Watt

HD 8310E has 1000% lower power consumption.

L20, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8310E and L20. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8310E is a notebook card while L20 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8310E
Radeon HD 8310E
NVIDIA L20
L20

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 30 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8310E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 6 votes

Rate L20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.