Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT vs AMD Radeon HD 8280E
Price now
59$
Games supported
48%
- Interface IGP
- Core clock speed 450 MHz
- Max video memory System Shared
- Memory type System Shared
- Memory clock speed System Shared
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 1.0 x16
- Core clock speed 400 MHz
- Max video memory 256 MB
- Memory type GDDR3
- Memory clock speed 1000 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Price now
225$
Games supported
48%
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance rating | 1097 | 1096 |
| Value for money | 0.01 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) | Curie (2003−2013) |
| GPU code name | Kalindi | G70 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 April 2013 (9 years old) | 11 August 2005 (17 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $449 |
| Current price | $59 | $225 (0.5x MSRP) |
Value for money
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 302 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 110 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 3.600 | 8.000 |
Dimensions and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 226 mm |
| Width | IGP | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 32 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 24%
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Recency | 23 April 2013 | 11 August 2005 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 110 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technical City couldn't decide between
and
The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Radeon HD 8280E by NVIDIA
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon HD 8280E from NVIDIA is GeForce 7800 GT, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon HD 8280E:
Competitors of GeForce 7800 GT by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce 7800 GT from AMD is Radeon HD 8280E, which is nearly equal in speed and is lower by 1 position in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce 7800 GT:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
