UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) vs Radeon HD 8280
Aggregate performance score
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) outperforms Radeon HD 8280 by a whopping 973% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 1142 | 512 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN (2011−2017) | Gen. 12 (2021) |
| GPU code name | Temash | Alder Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 64 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1400 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 3.600 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon HD 8280 and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | no data |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | no data |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) outperforms Radeon HD 8280 by 973% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) outperforms Radeon HD 8280 by 914% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) outperforms Radeon HD 8280 by 1086% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) outperforms Radeon HD 8280 by 750% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 1−2
−2000%
| 21
+2000%
|
| 1440p | 1−2
−1200%
| 13
+1200%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−500%
|
18
+500%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−650%
|
14−16
+650%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−400%
|
15
+400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−450%
|
21−24
+450%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−733%
|
24−27
+733%
|
| Hitman 3 | 3−4
−933%
|
31
+933%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−209%
|
34
+209%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
−300%
|
32
+300%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−650%
|
14−16
+650%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−267%
|
11
+267%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−575%
|
27
+575%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−733%
|
24−27
+733%
|
| Hitman 3 | 3−4
−433%
|
16−18
+433%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−136%
|
26
+136%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
−150%
|
20
+150%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−667%
|
23
+667%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−650%
|
14−16
+650%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−267%
|
10−12
+267%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−450%
|
21−24
+450%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−733%
|
24−27
+733%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−54.5%
|
17
+54.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−267%
|
11
+267%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−125%
|
9−10
+125%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14
+1300%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
−275%
|
14−16
+275%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
4K
High Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−260%
|
18−20
+260%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
This is how HD 8280 and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is 2000% faster in 1080p
- UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is 1200% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is 1300% faster than the HD 8280.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) surpassed HD 8280 in all 32 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.67 | 7.19 |
| Recency | 23 May 2013 | 4 January 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8280 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
