RTX A1000 Embedded vs Radeon HD 8250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8250 with RTX A1000 Embedded, including specs and performance data.

HD 8250
2013
8 Watt
0.52

RTX A1000 Embedded outperforms HD 8250 by a whopping 4963% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1288246
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.0157.93
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameKalindiGA107S
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)30 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1282048
Core clock speed300 MHz630 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz1140 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20072.96
Floating-point processing power0.1024 TFLOPS4.669 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8250 0.52
RTX A1000 Embedded 26.33
+4963%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8250 217
Samples: 261
RTX A1000 Embedded 11009
+4973%
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4900%
200−210
+4900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−4900%
400−450
+4900%
Valorant 27−30
−4900%
1350−1400
+4900%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−4900%
850−900
+4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Dota 2 10−12
−4900%
550−600
+4900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4900%
200−210
+4900%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−4900%
400−450
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−4900%
250−260
+4900%
Valorant 27−30
−4900%
1350−1400
+4900%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Dota 2 10−12
−4900%
550−600
+4900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4900%
200−210
+4900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−4900%
400−450
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−4900%
250−260
+4900%
Valorant 27−30
−4900%
1350−1400
+4900%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−4900%
300−310
+4900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−4900%
700−750
+4900%
Valorant 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.52 26.33
Recency 23 May 2013 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 35 Watt

HD 8250 has 338% lower power consumption.

RTX A1000 Embedded, on the other hand, has a 4963% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A1000 Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8250 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8250 is a notebook graphics card while RTX A1000 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 18 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 27 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8250 or RTX A1000 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.