GeForce 9200M vs Radeon HD 8250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8250 and GeForce 9200M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8250
2013
8 Watt
0.50
+47.1%

HD 8250 outperforms 9200M by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12841346
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.842.20
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameKalindiC79
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)15 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12816
Core clock speed300 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,178 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate3.2003.600
Floating-point processing power0.1024 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.34.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8250 0.50
+47.1%
GeForce 9200M 0.34

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8250 212
+48.3%
Samples: 260
GeForce 9200M 143
Samples: 51

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Valorant 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Valorant 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Valorant 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Valorant 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 0.34
Recency 23 May 2013 15 October 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 12 Watt

HD 8250 has a 47.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 8250 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9200M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8250
Radeon HD 8250
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M
GeForce 9200M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 18 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8250 or GeForce 9200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.