T400 Mobile vs Radeon HD 8210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1305not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.42no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameKalindiTU117
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date31 January 2014 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128896
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40079.80
Floating-point processing power0.0768 TFLOPS2.554 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared10 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 18 Watt

HD 8210 has 125% lower power consumption.

T400 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8210 and T400 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8210
Radeon HD 8210
NVIDIA T400 Mobile
T400 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 130 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate T400 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8210 or T400 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.