GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs Radeon HD 8210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1305not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.42no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameKalindiTU117
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date31 January 2014 (11 years ago)25 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128896
Core clock speed300 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1275 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40071.40
Floating-point processing power0.0768 TFLOPS2.285 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs856
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2014 25 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 31 Watt

HD 8210 has 287.5% lower power consumption.

MX450 30.5W 8Gbps, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8210 and GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8210
Radeon HD 8210
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 130 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 12 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8210 or GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.