RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell vs Radeon HD 8210

Place in the ranking	1289	1
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	4.43	26.84
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code name	Kalindi	GB202
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	31 January 2014 (11 years ago)	18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	14080
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1590 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2617 MHz
Number of transistors	1,178 million	92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	8 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	2.400	1,151
Floating-point processing power	0.0768 TFLOPS	73.69 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	176
TMUs	8	440
Tensor Cores	no data	440
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	110

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 5.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	48 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	1.34 TB/s
Shared memory	+	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.3	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.4
CUDA	-	12.0
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8210 0.44

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 100.00
+22627%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8210 195
Samples: 610

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 45357
+23160%

Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−21900%

1100−1150
+21900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −21900%	220−230 +21900%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 −21900%	1100−1150 +21900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −21900%	220−230 +21900%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −22400%	900−950 +22400%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 −21900%	1100−1150 +21900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −22043%	1550−1600 +22043%
Valorant	27−30 −22493%	6100−6150 +22493%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	16−18 −22400%	3600−3650 +22400%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −21900%	220−230 +21900%
Dota 2	5 −21900%	1100−1150 +21900%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −22400%	900−950 +22400%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 −21900%	1100−1150 +21900%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −22043%	1550−1600 +22043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −21900%	1100−1150 +21900%
Valorant	27−30 −22493%	6100−6150 +22493%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −21900%	220−230 +21900%
Dota 2	5 −21900%	1100−1150 +21900%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −22400%	900−950 +22400%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 −21900%	1100−1150 +21900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −22043%	1550−1600 +22043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −21900%	1100−1150 +21900%
Valorant	27−30 −22493%	6100−6150 +22493%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −21567%	650−700 +21567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	1−2 −21900%	220−230 +21900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −21900%	1100−1150 +21900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −22400%	450−500 +22400%
Hogwarts Legacy	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −21900%	220−230 +21900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −22567%	3400−3450 +22567%
Valorant	3−4 −21567%	650−700 +21567%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−22400%

450−500
+22400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

2−3

−22400%

450−500
+22400%

This is how HD 8210 and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is 21900% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.44	100.00
Recency	31 January 2014	18 March 2025
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	8 Watt	300 Watt

HD 8210 has 3650% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 22627.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8210 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8210 is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Radeon HD 8210

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon HD 8210

Radeon HD 6380G

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server

ATI HD 4350 PCIe x1

6480G

AMD R1E Mobile Graphics

Intel Graphics 5000

P5000

NVIDIA GTX 880M SLI

P4000

NVIDIA GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh

P4000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.7 127 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

2.8 85 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8210 or RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.