GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs Radeon HD 8210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1300not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.48no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameKalindiGT218
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date31 January 2014 (11 years ago)17 April 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12816
Core clock speed300 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate2.4004.160
Floating-point processing power0.0768 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.34.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2014 17 April 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 40 Watt

HD 8210 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8210 and GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8210 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8210
Radeon HD 8210
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 127 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 11 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8210 or GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.