Radeon RX 5700 XT vs HD 8180

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8180 with Radeon RX 5700 XT, including specs and performance data.

HD 8180
2013
4 Watt
0.32

RX 5700 XT outperforms HD 8180 by a whopping 12031% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1346123
Place by popularitynot in top-10053
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data39.21
Power efficiency6.0913.14
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameKalindiNavi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateNovember 2013 (11 years ago)7 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1282560
Core clock speed225 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1905 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate1.800304.8
Floating-point processing power0.0576 TFLOPS9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.131+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8180 0.32
RX 5700 XT 38.82
+12031%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8180 134
RX 5700 XT 16266
+12039%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 8180 268
RX 5700 XT 35823
+13267%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 8180 790
RX 5700 XT 83961
+10528%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 8180 145
RX 5700 XT 26189
+17961%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 8180 1493
RX 5700 XT 146093
+9685%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−12400%
125
+12400%
1440p0−176
4K-0−147

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.19
1440pno data5.25
4Kno data8.49

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7700%
78
+7700%
God of War 4−5
−3225%
133
+3225%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7700%
78
+7700%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5067%
155
+5067%
God of War 4−5
−2700%
112
+2700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2429%
177
+2429%
Valorant 24−27
−1152%
313
+1152%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−1886%
270−280
+1886%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7400%
75
+7400%
Dota 2 10−11
−820%
92
+820%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5033%
154
+5033%
God of War 4−5
−2225%
93
+2225%
Metro Exodus 0−1 97
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2271%
166
+2271%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2980%
154
+2980%
Valorant 24−27
−1076%
294
+1076%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6600%
67
+6600%
Dota 2 10−11
−930%
103
+930%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4833%
148
+4833%
God of War 4−5
−1425%
61
+1425%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1886%
139
+1886%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1760%
93
+1760%
Valorant 24−27
−536%
159
+536%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−5150%
105
+5150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5733%
170−180
+5733%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−11800%
119
+11800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 93

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−427%
79
+427%
Valorant 2−3
−12000%
242
+12000%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−5200%
53
+5200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2150%
45
+2150%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 347
+0%
347
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 308
+0%
308
+0%
Far Cry 5 138
+0%
138
+0%
Fortnite 223
+0%
223
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 173
+0%
173
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 177
+0%
177
+0%
Far Cry 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Fortnite 179
+0%
179
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 152
+0%
152
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+0%
145
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Far Cry 5 111
+0%
111
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 143
+0%
143
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+0%
79
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 286
+0%
286
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 97
+0%
97
+0%
God of War 52
+0%
52
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%
Dota 2 93
+0%
93
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+0%
79
+0%
God of War 32
+0%
32
+0%

This is how HD 8180 and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is 12400% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 12000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is ahead in 29 tests (46%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 38.82
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 225 Watt

HD 8180 has 5525% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT, on the other hand, has a 12031.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8180 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8180 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8180
Radeon HD 8180
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 43 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8180 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 9214 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8180 or Radeon RX 5700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.