Quadro FX 880M vs Radeon HD 7970M

Place in the ranking	475	1208
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	6.35	1.14
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code name	Wimbledon	GT216
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	24 April 2012 (12 years ago)	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	48
Core clock speed	850 MHz	550 MHz
Number of transistors	2,800 million	486 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	68.00	8.800
Floating-point processing power	2.176 TFLOPS	0.1162 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	8
TMUs	80	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	790 MHz
Memory bandwidth	153.6 GB/s	25.28 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	5.1	4.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	-	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7970M 9.26
+1497%

FX 880M 0.58

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7970M 3568
+1500%

FX 880M 223

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7970M 21938
+731%

FX 880M 2639

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	84 +1580%	5−6 −1580%
Full HD	60 +216%	19 −216%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16
+367%

3−4

−367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +450%	4−5 −450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14	0−1
Battlefield 5	27−30 +2700%	1−2 −2700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +2000%	1−2 −2000%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +1933%	3−4 −1933%
Hitman 3	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +364%	10−12 −364%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +2700%	1−2 −2700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +2400%	1−2 −2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +100%	30−33 −100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +450%	4−5 −450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14	0−1
Battlefield 5	27−30 +2700%	1−2 −2700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +2000%	1−2 −2000%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +1933%	3−4 −1933%
Hitman 3	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +364%	10−12 −364%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +2700%	1−2 −2700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +2400%	1−2 −2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +150%	10−11 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +100%	30−33 −100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +450%	4−5 −450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +2000%	1−2 −2000%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +1933%	3−4 −1933%
Hitman 3	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +364%	10−12 −364%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +150%	10−11 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +100%	30−33 −100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
+2400%

1−2

−2400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +1700%	1−2 −1700%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +1850%	2−3 −1850%
Hitman 3	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Metro Exodus	12−14	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +5700%	1−2 −5700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+400%

3−4

−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7	0−1
Hitman 3	5−6	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +1750%	2−3 −1750%
Metro Exodus	7−8	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	10−12	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+350%

2−3

−350%

This is how HD 7970M and FX 880M compete in popular games:

HD 7970M is 1580% faster in 900p
HD 7970M is 216% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7970M is 5700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, HD 7970M surpassed FX 880M in all 35 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.26	0.58
Recency	24 April 2012	7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	35 Watt

HD 7970M has a 1496.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

FX 880M, on the other hand, has 185.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7970M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 880M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7970M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 880M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.