GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs Radeon HD 7970M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7970M and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7970M
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.28

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms HD 7970M by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking475218
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.4028.94
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameWimbledonGN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 April 2012 (12 years ago)6 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802560
Core clock speed850 MHz1237 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1492 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate68.00no data
Floating-point processing power2.176 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12_2
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7970M 9.28
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 25.19
+171%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7970M 5645
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 17421
+209%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7970M 4694
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 11960
+155%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 7970M 31869
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 72486
+127%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p84
−162%
220−230
+162%
Full HD61
−16.4%
71
+16.4%
1440p12−14
−200%
36
+200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−194%
45−50
+194%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−326%
81
+326%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
−157%
75−80
+157%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−200%
48
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−68.4%
32
+68.4%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−184%
105
+184%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−191%
65−70
+191%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−164%
65−70
+164%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−120%
55−60
+120%
Valorant 35−40
−189%
100−110
+189%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
−157%
75−80
+157%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−150%
40
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−21.1%
23
+21.1%
Dota 2 30−35
−84.8%
61
+84.8%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−149%
97
+149%
Fortnite 50−55
−133%
120−130
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−132%
86
+132%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−191%
65−70
+191%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−176%
91
+176%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−164%
65−70
+164%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−119%
150−160
+119%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−120%
55−60
+120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−193%
80−85
+193%
Valorant 35−40
−189%
100−110
+189%
World of Tanks 121
−114%
250−260
+114%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
−157%
75−80
+157%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−113%
34
+113%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
19
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
−164%
85−90
+164%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−97.4%
75−80
+97.4%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−105%
76
+105%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−191%
65−70
+191%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−119%
150−160
+119%
Valorant 35−40
−189%
100−110
+189%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
−233%
40
+233%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−233%
40
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−289%
170−180
+289%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−188%
21−24
+188%
World of Tanks 65−70
−148%
160−170
+148%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−200%
50−55
+200%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+52.4%
21
−52.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−270%
70−75
+270%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−185%
57
+185%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−235%
55−60
+235%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−208%
37
+208%
Valorant 21−24
−196%
65−70
+196%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Dota 2 20−22
−120%
40−45
+120%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−132%
40−45
+132%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−185%
75−80
+185%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−132%
40−45
+132%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−225%
24−27
+225%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Dota 2 20−22
−120%
40−45
+120%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−200%
30−35
+200%
Fortnite 10−11
−210%
30−35
+210%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−225%
35−40
+225%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Valorant 9−10
−267%
30−35
+267%

This is how HD 7970M and RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 162% faster in 900p
  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 16% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 200% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7970M is 52% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 475% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 7970M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is ahead in 62 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.28 25.19
Recency 24 April 2012 6 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile has a 171.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7970M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7970M
Radeon HD 7970M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 43 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 694 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.