ATI Radeon 9200 vs HD 7970M Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire with Radeon 9200, including specs and performance data.

HD 7970M Crossfire
2012
200 Watt
14.46
+144500%

HD 7970M Crossfire outperforms 9200 by a whopping 144500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3991596
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.570.03
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameWimbledon XTRV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2012 (13 years ago)1 May 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed850 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistorsno data36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.000
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.18.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p132-0−1
Full HD102-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 80−85 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 30−35 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 60−65 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 80−85 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1
Far Cry 5 45−50 0−1
Fortnite 80−85 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 45−50 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 0−1
Valorant 120−130 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 60−65 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 80−85 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1
Dota 2 90−95 0−1
Far Cry 5 45−50 0−1
Fortnite 80−85 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 45−50 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60 0−1
Metro Exodus 30−35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 0−1
Valorant 120−130 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1
Dota 2 90−95 0−1
Far Cry 5 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 0−1
Valorant 120−130 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 80−85 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27 0−1
Metro Exodus 18−20 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150 0−1
Valorant 150−160 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 0−1
Far Cry 5 30−35 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 30−35 0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 0−1
Valorant 80−85 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 50−55 0−1
Far Cry 5 16−18 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 14−16 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.46 0.01
Recency 1 May 2012 1 May 2003
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 28 Watt

HD 7970M Crossfire has a 144500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200, on the other hand, has 614% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9200 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 19 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 56 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire or Radeon 9200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.