Tesla P4 vs Radeon HD 7970

Place in the ranking	431	293
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.14	no data
Power efficiency	3.85	22.02
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Tahiti	GP104
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Design	reference	no data
Release date	9 January 2012 (13 years ago)	13 September 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	2560
Core clock speed	no data	886 MHz
Boost clock speed	925 MHz	1114 MHz
Number of transistors	4,313 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	118.4	178.2
Floating-point processing power	3.789 TFLOPS	5.704 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	128	160
L1 Cache	512 KB	960 KB
L2 Cache	768 KB	2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	275 mm	168 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1375 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	192.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2	No outputs
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire	+	-
FreeSync	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 11	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5 (5.1)	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1 (1.2)	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7970 12.49

Tesla P4 21.43
+71.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7970 5248
Samples: 10419

Tesla P4 9004
+71.6%

Samples: 50

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	105 −71.4%	180−190 +71.4%
Full HD	93 −61.3%	150−160 +61.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

5.90

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −69%	120−130 +69%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	55−60 −69.6%	95−100 +69.6%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −69%	120−130 +69%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Escape from Tarkov	50−55 −63.5%	85−90 +63.5%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −66.7%	70−75 +66.7%
Fortnite	70−75 −62.2%	120−130 +62.2%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −66.7%	90−95 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 −66.7%	65−70 +66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −63%	75−80 +63%
Valorant	110−120 −71.2%	190−200 +71.2%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	55−60 −69.6%	95−100 +69.6%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −69%	120−130 +69%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	212 −65.1%	350−400 +65.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Dota 2	85−90 −64.7%	140−150 +64.7%
Escape from Tarkov	50−55 −63.5%	85−90 +63.5%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −66.7%	70−75 +66.7%
Fortnite	70−75 −62.2%	120−130 +62.2%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −66.7%	90−95 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 −66.7%	65−70 +66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 −66.7%	80−85 +66.7%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −63%	75−80 +63%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −66.7%	55−60 +66.7%
Valorant	110−120 −71.2%	190−200 +71.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	55−60 −69.6%	95−100 +69.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Dota 2	85−90 −64.7%	140−150 +64.7%
Escape from Tarkov	50−55 −63.5%	85−90 +63.5%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −66.7%	70−75 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −66.7%	90−95 +66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −63%	75−80 +63%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −66.7%	55−60 +66.7%
Valorant	110−120 −71.2%	190−200 +71.2%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

70−75
−62.2%

120−130

+62.2%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −66.7%	40−45 +66.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	95−100 −66.7%	160−170 +66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −71.4%	180−190 +71.4%
Valorant	130−140 −70.4%	230−240 +70.4%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	35−40 −71.4%	60−65 +71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Escape from Tarkov	24−27 −60%	40−45 +60%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −66.7%	45−50 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −61.3%	50−55 +61.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −66.7%	30−33 +66.7%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

27−30

−60.7%

45−50
+60.7%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −66.7%	40−45 +66.7%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%
Valorant	65−70 −59.4%	110−120 +59.4%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	18−20 −66.7%	30−33 +66.7%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Dota 2	45−50 −63%	75−80 +63%
Escape from Tarkov	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −61.5%	21−24 +61.5%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −59.1%	35−40 +59.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

12−14

−50%

18−20
+50%

This is how HD 7970 and Tesla P4 compete in popular games:

Tesla P4 is 71% faster in 900p
Tesla P4 is 61% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.49	21.43
Recency	9 January 2012	13 September 2016
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	75 Watt

Tesla P4 has a 71.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

The Tesla P4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7970 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7970 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla P4 is a workstation one.