GeForce 8200M G vs Radeon HD 7970

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7970 with GeForce 8200M G, including specs and performance data.

HD 7970
2012, $549
6 GB GDDR5, 300 Watt
12.55
+7744%

HD 7970 outperforms 8200M G by a whopping 7744% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4311480
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.15no data
Power efficiency3.86no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)no data
GPU code nameTahitiMCP77MV MCP79MVL
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date9 January 2012 (13 years ago)3 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20488
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Wattno data
Texture fill rate118.4no data
Floating-point processing power3.789 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs128no data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1375 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth264 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2no data
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1110
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7970 12.55
+7744%
8200M G 0.16

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7970 5248
+7974%
Samples: 10419
8200M G 65
Samples: 366

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p105
+10400%
1−2
−10400%
Full HD93
+9200%
1−2
−9200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.90no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 70−75 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55 0−1
Far Cry 5 40−45 0−1
Fortnite 70−75 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1700%
3−4
−1700%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+557%
7−8
−557%
Valorant 110−120
+363%
24−27
−363%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 212
+1827%
10−12
−1827%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Dota 2 85−90
+963%
8−9
−963%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55 0−1
Far Cry 5 40−45 0−1
Fortnite 70−75 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1700%
3−4
−1700%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50 0−1
Metro Exodus 24−27 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+557%
7−8
−557%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Valorant 110−120
+363%
24−27
−363%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Dota 2 85−90
+963%
8−9
−963%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55 0−1
Far Cry 5 40−45 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1700%
3−4
−1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+557%
7−8
−557%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Valorant 110−120
+363%
24−27
−363%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+9500%
1−2
−9500%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 0−1
Metro Exodus 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+5150%
2−3
−5150%
Valorant 130−140
+13400%
1−2
−13400%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Far Cry 5 27−30 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30 0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Metro Exodus 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1
Valorant 65−70
+6800%
1−2
−6800%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 45−50 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 12−14 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%

This is how HD 7970 and 8200M G compete in popular games:

  • HD 7970 is 10400% faster in 900p
  • HD 7970 is 9200% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the HD 7970 is 6800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, HD 7970 surpassed 8200M G in all 27 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.55 0.16
Recency 9 January 2012 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm

HD 7970 has a 7743.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 7970 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7970 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 8200M G is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7970
Radeon HD 7970
NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
GeForce 8200M G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 337 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 39 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7970 or GeForce 8200M G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.