ATI Radeon 9000 PRO vs HD 7950M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameWimbledonRV250
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 April 2012 (13 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed700 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate56.001.100
Floating-point processing power1.792 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs804
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s8.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 April 2012 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 28 Watt

HD 7950M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9000 PRO, on the other hand, has 168% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7950M and Radeon 9000 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7950M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9000 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7950M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 17 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7950M or Radeon 9000 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.