ATI Radeon 9000 PRO vs HD 7660G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1113not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.53no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameDevastatorRV250
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2012 (13 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed686 MHz275 MHz
Boost clock speed686 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate16.461.100
Floating-point processing power0.5268 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared275 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2012 1 July 2002
Chip lithography 32 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

HD 7660G has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 369% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9000 PRO, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7660G and Radeon 9000 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7660G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9000 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 154 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7660G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 17 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7660G or Radeon 9000 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.