Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 vs HD 7950 Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated434
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data15.01
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTahitiVega Kaby Lake-G
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 March 2013 (13 years ago)7 January 2018 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921280
Core clock speed800 MHz931 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1011 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate89.60no data
Floating-point processing power2.867 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs112no data
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth240.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 March 2013 7 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 65 Watt

RX Vega M GL / 870 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 207.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition and Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 22 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 120 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition or Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.