Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking651not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.11no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameVega RenoirTahiti
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)7 March 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841792
Core clock speed400 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rateno data89.60
Floating-point processing powerno data2.867 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data112
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data3 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data240.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2020 7 March 2013
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 828 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 22 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) or Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.