GeForce GTX 765M vs Radeon HD 7870M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7870M and GeForce GTX 765M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7870M
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 45 Watt
3.91

GTX 765M outperforms HD 7870M by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking701619
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.964.73
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameHeathrowGK106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 April 2012 (12 years ago)30 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640768
Core clock speed800 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speedno data863 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate32.0055.23
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPS1.326 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Standard memory configurationno dataGDDR5
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s64.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
LVDS signal supportno dataUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportno dataUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
HDMI-+
HDCP content protection-+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI-+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support-+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder-+
Optimus-+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 API
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7870M 3.91
GTX 765M 5.18
+32.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7870M 1507
GTX 765M 1997
+32.5%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7870M 2702
GTX 765M 4019
+48.7%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7870M 13065
GTX 765M 14870
+13.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p35−40
−45.7%
51
+45.7%
Full HD27−30
−44.4%
39
+44.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−43.5%
30−35
+43.5%
Hitman 3 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−22.2%
30−35
+22.2%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−11.9%
45−50
+11.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−43.5%
30−35
+43.5%
Hitman 3 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−22.2%
30−35
+22.2%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−11.9%
45−50
+11.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−43.5%
30−35
+43.5%
Hitman 3 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−22.2%
30−35
+22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−11.9%
45−50
+11.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Hitman 3 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−37.5%
30−35
+37.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hitman 3 0−1 1−2
Metro Exodus 0−1 2−3

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how HD 7870M and GTX 765M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 765M is 46% faster in 900p
  • GTX 765M is 44% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 765M is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 765M is ahead in 59 tests (89%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.91 5.18
Recency 24 April 2012 30 May 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 75 Watt

HD 7870M has 66.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 765M, on the other hand, has a 32.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The GeForce GTX 765M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7870M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7870M
Radeon HD 7870M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GeForce GTX 765M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 13 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7870M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 74 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.