FirePro W4170M vs Radeon HD 7870

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7870 with FirePro W4170M, including specs and performance data.

HD 7870
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 175 Watt
12.02
+352%

HD 7870 outperforms W4170M by a whopping 352% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking376776
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.820.14
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code namePitcairn XTMars XTX?
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date5 March 2012 (12 years ago)16 November 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$412.83 no data
Current price$200 (0.5x MSRP)$495

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 7870 has 1914% better value for money than W4170M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280384
Core clock speed1000 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors2800 Million950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Wattno data
Texture fill rate80.0021.60
Floating-point performanceno data691.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 7870 and FirePro W4170M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+no data
HDMI+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7870 12.02
+352%
W4170M 2.66

Radeon HD 7870 outperforms FirePro W4170M by 352% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 7870 4640
+351%
W4170M 1029

Radeon HD 7870 outperforms FirePro W4170M by 351% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 7870 6194
+168%
W4170M 2315

Radeon HD 7870 outperforms FirePro W4170M by 168% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p84
+367%
18−20
−367%
Full HD72
+177%
26
−177%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Hitman 3 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40
+388%
8−9
−388%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Hitman 3 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40
+388%
8−9
−388%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Hitman 3 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10 no data
Hitman 3 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 12−14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12 no data

This is how HD 7870 and W4170M compete in popular games:

  • HD 7870 is 367% faster in 900p
  • HD 7870 is 177% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.02 2.66
Recency 5 March 2012 16 November 2012

The Radeon HD 7870 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W4170M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7870 is a desktop card while FirePro W4170M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7870
Radeon HD 7870
AMD FirePro W4170M
FirePro W4170M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 586 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 24 votes

Rate FirePro W4170M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.