Arc A380 vs Radeon HD 7850M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7850M with Arc A380, including specs and performance data.

HD 7850M
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
3.56

Arc A380 outperforms HD 7850M by a whopping 353% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking722334
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.12
Power efficiency6.1014.75
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameHeathrowDG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 April 2012 (12 years ago)14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401024
Core clock speed675 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate27.00131.2
Floating-point processing power0.864 TFLOPS4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4064
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data222 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s186.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7850M 3.56
Arc A380 16.14
+353%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7850M 1372
Arc A380 6219
+353%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7850M 2467
Arc A380 13892
+463%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7850M 12254
Arc A380 53979
+341%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−370%
47
+370%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.17

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−510%
61
+510%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−2400%
50
+2400%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−1286%
95−100
+1286%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−663%
60−65
+663%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−857%
65−70
+857%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−660%
75−80
+660%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−720%
160−170
+720%
Hitman 3 9−10
−589%
60−65
+589%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−428%
130−140
+428%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1583%
100−110
+1583%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−636%
100−110
+636%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−176%
110−120
+176%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−620%
72
+620%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1750%
37
+1750%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−1286%
95−100
+1286%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−663%
60−65
+663%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−857%
65−70
+857%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−660%
75−80
+660%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−720%
160−170
+720%
Hitman 3 9−10
−589%
60−65
+589%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−428%
130−140
+428%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1583%
100−110
+1583%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−471%
80
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−320%
60−65
+320%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−176%
110−120
+176%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−190%
29
+190%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1450%
31
+1450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−663%
60−65
+663%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−857%
65−70
+857%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−185%
57
+185%
Hitman 3 9−10
−589%
60−65
+589%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−108%
52
+108%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−336%
61
+336%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−127%
34
+127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+64%
25
−64%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−833%
55−60
+833%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−933%
30−35
+933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−8450%
170−180
+8450%
Hitman 3 8−9
−350%
35−40
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−589%
60−65
+589%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1200%
35−40
+1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−627%
160−170
+627%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1350%
27−30
+1350%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−550%
24−27
+550%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how HD 7850M and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A380 is 370% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7850M is 64% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A380 is 8450% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 7850M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • Arc A380 is ahead in 57 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (12%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.56 16.14
Recency 24 April 2012 14 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 75 Watt

HD 7850M has 87.5% lower power consumption.

Arc A380, on the other hand, has a 353.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7850M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7850M is a notebook card while Arc A380 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7850M
Radeon HD 7850M
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 18 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7850M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 836 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.