Radeon R7 265 vs HD 7850

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

HD 7850
2012
2048 MB GDDR5
9.96

R7 265 outperforms HD 7850 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking415402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money1.401.67
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code namePitcairnPitcairn
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferencereference
Release date5 March 2012 (12 years ago)13 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $149
Current price$267 (1.1x MSRP)$242 (1.6x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R7 265 has 19% better value for money than HD 7850.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241024
Boost clock speed1000 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate55.0459.20
Floating-point performance1,761 gflops1,894 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length210 mm210 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1 x 6-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s179.2 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity11
HDMI++
DisplayPort support--

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration--
CrossFire11
Enduro--
FreeSync11
HD3D--
PowerTune--
TrueAudio--
ZeroCore--
DDMA audiono data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12DirectX® 12
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+no data
Mantle--

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7850 9.96
R7 265 10.33
+3.7%

R7 265 outperforms HD 7850 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 7850 5210
R7 265 5220
+0.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 9.96 10.33
Recency 5 March 2012 13 February 2014
Cost $249 $149
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 150 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 7850 and Radeon R7 265.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7850
Radeon HD 7850
AMD Radeon R7 265
Radeon R7 265

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 777 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 346 votes

Rate Radeon R7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.