Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon HD 7850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7850 with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

HD 7850
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
10.00
+3.1%

HD 7850 outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking417426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.45no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Xe LPG
GPU code namePitcairnMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date5 March 2012 (12 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data
Current price$267 (1.1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10244
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattno data
Texture fill rate55.04no data
Floating-point performance1,761 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 7850 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1200 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support-no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212_2
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+no data
Mantle-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7850 10.00
+3.1%
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 9.70

Radeon HD 7850 outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 7850 5210
+2.4%
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 5088

Radeon HD 7850 outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by 2% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−4.2%
25
+4.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Hitman 3 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Hitman 3 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Hitman 3 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Hitman 3 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

This is how HD 7850 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 4% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.00 9.70
Recency 5 March 2012 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 7850 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc).

Be aware that Radeon HD 7850 is a desktop card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7850
Radeon HD 7850
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 785 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.