Radeon HD 8410G vs HD 7770M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7290 7330M 7350M 7370M 7400G 7410M 7420G 7430M 7450A 7450M 7470A 7470M 7490M 7500G 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics 7510M 7520G 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7530M 7550M 7560G IGP 7570M 7590M 7600G 7610M 7620G 7630M 7640G 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7650A 7650M 7650M Rebrand 7660G 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 7670A 7670M 7670M Rebrand 7690M 7690M Rebrand 7690M XT 7690M XT Rebrand 7730M 7750M 7770M 7850M 7870M 7950M 7970M 7970M Crossfire 7970M X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8180 8210 8210E 8240 Mobile IGP 8250 8280 Mobile IGP 8280E 8310E 8310G 8330 Mobile IGP 8330E 8350G 8400 Mobile IGP 8400E 8410G 8450G 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics 8510G 8530M 8550G 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics 8550M 8570A 8570M 8590M 8610G 8610G IGP 8650G 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 8650M 8670A 8670M 8690M 8730A 8730M 8750A 8750M 8770M 8790M 8830M 8850M 8870M 8950M 8970M 8970M Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7770M and Radeon HD 8410G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7770M
2012
1 GB GDDR5, 32 Watt
3.16
+204%

HD 7770M outperforms HD 8410G by a whopping 204% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
HD 7770M HD 7770M
HD 8410G HD 8410G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8011147
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.602.29
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameChelseaScrapper
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 April 2012 (13 years ago)23 May 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512192
Core clock speed675 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speedno data720 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate21.608.640
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS0.2765 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs3212
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Fortnite 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Valorant 45−50
+50%
30−35
−50%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+127%
24−27
−127%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 30−33
+100%
14−16
−100%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Fortnite 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Valorant 45−50
+50%
30−35
−50%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 30−33
+100%
14−16
−100%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Valorant 45−50
+50%
30−35
−50%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+155%
10−12
−155%
Valorant 30−35 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Valorant 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 7770M is 750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, HD 7770M surpassed HD 8410G in all 38 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.16 1.04
Recency 24 April 2012 23 May 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 35 Watt

HD 7770M has a 204% higher aggregate performance score, a 14% more advanced lithography process, and 9% lower power consumption.

HD 8410G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The Radeon HD 7770M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8410G in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD 7770M Radeon HD 7770M
vs
GT 750M GeForce GT 750M
HD 8410G Radeon HD 8410G
vs
GeForce 800A GeForce 800A
HD 7770M Radeon HD 7770M
vs
GTX 280M SLI GeForce GTX 280M SLI
GT 745M GeForce GT 745M
vs
ATI X1650 Radeon X1650
GT 745M GeForce GT 745M
vs
ATI X1600 Radeon X1600
GT 745M GeForce GT 745M
vs
9300 GE GeForce 9300 GE
GT 745M GeForce GT 745M
vs
GRID M6-8Q GRID M6-8Q
GT 745M GeForce GT 745M
vs
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
HD 7770M Radeon HD 7770M
vs
FX 350M FX 350M
HD 7770M Radeon HD 7770M
vs
Quadro 4100 Quadro 4100
HD 7770M Radeon HD 7770M
vs
R7 M265DX R7 M265DX
HD 7770M Radeon HD 7770M
vs
R6 M335DX R6 M335DX
HD 7770M Radeon HD 7770M
vs
Go 6150 + nForce Go 430 Go 6150 + nForce Go 430

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.4 8 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 8410G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7770M or Radeon HD 8410G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.