ATI Radeon HD 5670 vs HD 7770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7770M with Radeon HD 5670, including specs and performance data.

HD 7770M
2012
1 GB GDDR5, 32 Watt
3.35
+65%

HD 7770M outperforms ATI HD 5670 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking737886
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.26
Power efficiency7.352.23
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameChelseaRedwood
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 April 2012 (12 years ago)14 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512400
Core clock speed675 MHz775 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt64 Watt
Texture fill rate21.6015.50
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS0.62 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3220

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7770M 3.35
+65%
ATI HD 5670 2.03

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7770M 2110
+43.7%
ATI HD 5670 1468

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7770M 10468
+59%
ATI HD 5670 6584

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p40−45
+53.8%
26
−53.8%
Full HD50−55
+51.5%
33
−51.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.61

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Fortnite 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Valorant 45−50
+23.1%
35−40
−23.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Dota 2 30−35
+40.9%
21−24
−40.9%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Fortnite 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Valorant 45−50
+23.1%
35−40
−23.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Dota 2 30−35
+40.9%
21−24
−40.9%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Valorant 45−50
+23.1%
35−40
−23.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+84.6%
12−14
−84.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Valorant 30−35
+113%
14−16
−113%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how HD 7770M and ATI HD 5670 compete in popular games:

  • HD 7770M is 54% faster in 900p
  • HD 7770M is 52% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7770M is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, HD 7770M surpassed ATI HD 5670 in all 56 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.35 2.03
Recency 24 April 2012 14 January 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 64 Watt

HD 7770M has a 65% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7770M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5670 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7770M is a notebook card while Radeon HD 5670 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7770M
Radeon HD 7770M
ATI Radeon HD 5670
Radeon HD 5670

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 8 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 459 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7770M or Radeon HD 5670, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.