GeForce RTX 2080 vs Radeon HD 7770M

Place in performance ranking	695	57
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	28.14
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Chelsea XT	Turing TU104
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	24 April 2012 (12 years ago)	27 August 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	2944
Core clock speed	675 MHz	1515 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1710 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	32 Watt	215 Watt
Texture fill rate	21.60	314.6
Floating-point performance	691.2 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 7770M and GeForce RTX 2080 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7770M 3.51

RTX 2080 48.72
+1288%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7770M 10468

RTX 2080 66631
+537%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7770M 2110

RTX 2080 40278
+1809%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10−12 −1350%	145 +1350%
1440p	7−8 −1329%	100 +1329%
4K	5−6 −1340%	72 +1340%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7

−1383%

85−90
+1383%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −950%	105 +950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −4800%	98 +4800%
Battlefield 5	7−8 −2671%	194 +2671%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −1550%	132 +1550%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1383%	85−90 +1383%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1714%	127 +1714%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −1550%	165 +1550%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 −1210%	262 +1210%
Hitman 3	9−10 −1400%	135 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −952%	263 +952%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −2300%	144 +2300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −1111%	109 +1111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −1436%	215 +1436%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −517%	253 +517%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −1430%	153 +1430%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −4050%	83 +4050%
Battlefield 5	7−8 −2500%	182 +2500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −1363%	117 +1363%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1383%	85−90 +1383%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1357%	102 +1357%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −1160%	126 +1160%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 −1115%	243 +1115%
Hitman 3	9−10 −1356%	131 +1356%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −916%	254 +916%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −2300%	144 +2300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −1200%	117 +1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −1236%	180−190 +1236%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −573%	100−110 +573%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −493%	243 +493%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −580%	68 +580%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −3550%	73 +3550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −1025%	90 +1025%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1383%	85−90 +1383%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1057%	81 +1057%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 −560%	132 +560%
Hitman 3	9−10 −1178%	115 +1178%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −576%	169 +576%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −1236%	180−190 +1236%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −607%	106 +607%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −92.7%	79 +92.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10

−1000%

99
+1000%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −1950%	123 +1950%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1660%	88 +1660%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1833%	58 +1833%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −2200%	69 +2200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2050%	40−45 +2050%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1650%	70 +1650%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −21100%	212 +21100%
Hitman 3	8−9 −900%	80 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1513%	129 +1513%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −2467%	75−80 +2467%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −1038%	239 +1038%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

−1257%

95
+1257%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −3200%	66 +3200%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −2400%	50 +2400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1950%	41 +1950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −3700%	38 +3700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −3700%	38 +3700%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	18−20
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1850%	39 +1850%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −8000%	81 +8000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −3400%	35 +3400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−1375%

59
+1375%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60 +0%	60 +0%
Metro Exodus	89 +0%	89 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	48 +0%	48 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	117 +0%	117 +0%
Metro Exodus	82 +0%	82 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	76 +0%	76 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

70−75

+0%

70−75

+0%

This is how HD 7770M and RTX 2080 compete in popular games:

RTX 2080 is 1350% faster in 1080p
RTX 2080 is 1329% faster in 1440p
RTX 2080 is 1340% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2080 is 21100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2080 is ahead in 63 tests (89%)
there's a draw in 8 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.51	48.72
Recency	24 April 2012	27 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	32 Watt	215 Watt

HD 7770M has 571.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080, on the other hand, has a 1288% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7770M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7770M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2080 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.