Radeon RX 560X vs HD 7770

Place in the ranking	603	511
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.45	no data
Power efficiency	4.87	7.58
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	Cape Verde	Polaris 21
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	15 February 2012 (12 years ago)	11 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$159	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	1024
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1175 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1275 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	40.00	81.60
Floating-point processing power	1.28 TFLOPS	2.611 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	210 mm	170 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1125 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7770 5.65

RX 560X 8.24
+45.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7770 2172

RX 560X 3168
+45.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	47 −38.3%	65−70 +38.3%
Full HD	46 −41.3%	65−70 +41.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

3.46

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Elden Ring	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −30.4%	30−33 +30.4%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Valorant	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Dota 2	18−20 −42.1%	27−30 +42.1%
Elden Ring	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −29.6%	35−40 +29.6%
Fortnite	30−35 −36.4%	45−50 +36.4%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −30.4%	30−33 +30.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −42.1%	27−30 +42.1%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −38.3%	65−70 +38.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%
Valorant	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%
World of Tanks	128 −40.6%	180−190 +40.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Dota 2	18−20 −42.1%	27−30 +42.1%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −29.6%	35−40 +29.6%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −30.4%	30−33 +30.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −38.3%	65−70 +38.3%
Valorant	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Elden Ring	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −42.9%	50−55 +42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
World of Tanks	40−45 −34.1%	55−60 +34.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Valorant	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Elden Ring	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Fortnite	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Valorant	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%

This is how HD 7770 and RX 560X compete in popular games:

RX 560X is 38% faster in 900p
RX 560X is 41% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.65	8.24
Recency	15 February 2012	11 April 2018
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	75 Watt

RX 560X has a 45.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 6.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 560X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7770 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.