ATI Radeon E4690 vs HD 7770

Place in performance ranking	596	1098
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.63	no data
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	Cape Verde	RV730
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	15 February 2012 (12 years ago)	1 June 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$129.99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	320
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	600 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	514 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	40.00	19.20
Floating-point performance	1.28 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-II
Length	210 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	MXM Module
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	22.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	no data
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	10.1
Shader Model	5.1	4.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7770 5.63
+436%

ATI E4690 1.05

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7770 2171
+436%

ATI E4690 405

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	47 +488%	8−9 −488%
Full HD	50 +456%	9−10 −456%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10
+800%

1−2

−800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +500%	6−7 −500%
Hitman 3	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +483%	6−7 −483%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +500%	8−9 −500%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +500%	6−7 −500%
Hitman 3	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +483%	6−7 −483%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +500%	8−9 −500%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +500%	6−7 −500%
Hitman 3	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +483%	6−7 −483%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +500%	8−9 −500%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

+650%

2−3
−650%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Hitman 3	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Metro Exodus	4−5	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +500%	6−7 −500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11
+900%

1−2

−900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5	0−1
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+500%

1−2

−500%

This is how HD 7770 and ATI E4690 compete in popular games:

HD 7770 is 488% faster in 900p
HD 7770 is 456% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.63	1.05
Recency	15 February 2012	1 June 2009
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	30 Watt

HD 7770 has a 436.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI E4690, on the other hand, has 166.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E4690 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.