Quadro FX 4600 vs Radeon HD 7770

Place in the ranking	598	1078
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.33	no data
Power efficiency	4.86	0.57
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	Cape Verde	G80
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	15 February 2012 (12 years ago)	5 March 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$159	$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 7770 and FX 4600 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	96
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	500 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	681 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	134 Watt
Texture fill rate	40.00	24.00
Floating-point processing power	1.28 TFLOPS	0.2304 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	24
TMUs	40	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	210 mm	229 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	768 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1125 MHz	700 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	67.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.1	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7770 5.63
+407%

FX 4600 1.11

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7770 2173
+405%

FX 4600 430

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	47 +422%	9−10 −422%
Full HD	45 +463%	8−9 −463%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

3.53

249.88

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10
+800%

1−2

−800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +414%	7−8 −414%
Hitman 3	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +483%	6−7 −483%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +433%	9−10 −433%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +414%	7−8 −414%
Hitman 3	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +483%	6−7 −483%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +433%	9−10 −433%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +414%	7−8 −414%
Hitman 3	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +483%	6−7 −483%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +433%	9−10 −433%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

+650%

2−3
−650%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Hitman 3	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Metro Exodus	4−5	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +414%	7−8 −414%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11
+900%

1−2

−900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5	0−1
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+500%

1−2

−500%

This is how HD 7770 and FX 4600 compete in popular games:

HD 7770 is 422% faster in 900p
HD 7770 is 463% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.63	1.11
Recency	15 February 2012	5 March 2007
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	768 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	134 Watt

HD 7770 has a 407.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 67.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7770 is a desktop card while Quadro FX 4600 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.