Radeon HD 8510G vs HD 7730
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 7730 with Radeon HD 8510G, including specs and performance data.
HD 7730 outperforms HD 8510G by a whopping 218% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 810 | 1161 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.16 | no data |
Power efficiency | 4.59 | 1.94 |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) |
GPU code name | Cape Verde | Devastator |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 May 2013 (12 years ago) | 23 May 2013 (12 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 554 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 720 MHz |
Number of transistors | 1,500 million | 1,303 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 47 Watt | 35 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 19.20 | 17.28 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.6144 TFLOPS | 0.553 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 8 | 8 |
TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Length | 168 mm | no data |
Width | 1-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | System Shared |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | System Shared |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Fortnite | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Valorant | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Fortnite | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Valorant | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Valorant | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 34 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 2.83 | 0.89 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 47 Watt | 35 Watt |
HD 7730 has a 218% higher aggregate performance score, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.
HD 8510G, on the other hand, has 34.3% lower power consumption.
The Radeon HD 7730 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8510G in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 7730 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 8510G is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.