GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 7730

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon HD 7730 Radeon HD 7750 Radeon HD 7770 Radeon HD 8730 OEM Radeon HD 8740 OEM Radeon HD 8760 OEM Radeon R7 250E Radeon R7 250X Radeon R7 250XE Radeon R7 350 Radeon R7 350 640SP Radeon R7 450 OEM Radeon R9 255 OEM Radeon RX 540 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 GTX 1650 GDDR6 GTX 1650 SUPER GTX 1650 TU106 GTX 1650 TU116

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7730 and GeForce GTX 1650, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7730
2013
1 GB GDDR5, 47 Watt
3.14

GTX 1650 outperforms HD 7730 by a whopping 553% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

HD 7730 HD 7730
GTX 1650 GTX 1650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking757273
Place by popularitynot in top-1003
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1638.24
Power efficiency4.6118.84
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameCape VerdeTU117
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 May 2013 (11 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 has 23800% better value for money than HD 7730.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384896
Core clock speed800 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2093.24
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7730 3.14
GTX 1650 20.49
+553%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7730 1207
GTX 1650 7876
+553%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−590%
69
+590%
1440p6−7
−567%
40
+567%
4K3−4
−667%
23
+667%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.90
−173%
2.16
+173%
1440p9.83
−164%
3.73
+164%
4K19.67
−204%
6.48
+204%
  • GTX 1650 has 173% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 has 164% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 has 204% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 94
+0%
94
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Metro Exodus 66
+0%
66
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 77
+0%
77
+0%
Valorant 85
+0%
85
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Dota 2 82
+0%
82
+0%
Far Cry 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Fortnite 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 74
+0%
74
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75
+0%
75
+0%
Metro Exodus 44
+0%
44
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 46
+0%
46
+0%
World of Tanks 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55
+0%
55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%
Dota 2 92
+0%
92
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+0%
62
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 61
+0%
61
+0%
Valorant 70
+0%
70
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
World of Tanks 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45
+0%
45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 41
+0%
41
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 40
+0%
40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+0%
29
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+0%
29
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3
+0%
3
+0%
Dota 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 21
+0%
21
+0%

This is how HD 7730 and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is 590% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 is 567% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 is 667% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.14 20.49
Recency 1 May 2013 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 75 Watt

HD 7730 has 59.6% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650, on the other hand, has a 552.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7730 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon HD 7730
Radeon HD 7730
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD 7730 Radeon HD 7730
vs
GTX 295 GeForce GTX 295
GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650
vs
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
HD 7730 Radeon HD 7730
vs
GTX 260 GeForce GTX 260
HD 7730 Radeon HD 7730
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
HD 7730 Radeon HD 7730
vs
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
HD 7730 Radeon HD 7730
vs
RX Vega 3 Radeon RX Vega 3
HD 7730 Radeon HD 7730
vs
RX Vega Mobile Radeon RX Vega Mobile
HD 7730 Radeon HD 7730
vs
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
HD 7730 Radeon HD 7730
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
HD 7730 Radeon HD 7730
vs
MX450 N18S-G5 GeForce MX450 N18S-G5
HD 7730 Radeon HD 7730
vs
Graphics Radeon Graphics
HD 7730 Radeon HD 7730
vs
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
HD 7730 Radeon HD 7730
vs
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 81 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 24398 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.