T1000 vs Radeon HD 7690M

Place in the ranking	838	274
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.17	27.40
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Thames	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	25 December 2011 (12 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	480	896
Core clock speed	725 MHz	1065 MHz
Boost clock speed	725 MHz	1395 MHz
Number of transistors	716 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	17.40	78.12
Floating-point processing power	0.696 TFLOPS	2.5 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	24	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.6
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7690M 2.36

T1000 19.78
+738%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7690M 909

T1000 7635
+740%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7690M 1141

T1000 11793
+934%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7690M 5884

T1000 46318
+687%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	25 −700%	200−210 +700%
Full HD	16 −263%	58 +263%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6
−700%

40−45

+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −713%	65−70 +713%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −650%	30−33 +650%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −718%	90−95 +718%
Hitman 3	7−8 −686%	55−60 +686%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −689%	150−160 +689%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −718%	90−95 +718%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −711%	300−310 +711%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −713%	65−70 +713%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −650%	30−33 +650%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −718%	90−95 +718%
Hitman 3	7−8 −686%	55−60 +686%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −689%	150−160 +689%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −718%	90−95 +718%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −669%	100−105 +669%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −711%	300−310 +711%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −713%	65−70 +713%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −650%	30−33 +650%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −718%	90−95 +718%
Hitman 3	7−8 −686%	55−60 +686%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −689%	150−160 +689%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −718%	90−95 +718%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −669%	100−105 +669%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −711%	300−310 +711%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
−700%

40−45

+700%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −650%	30−33 +650%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%
Hitman 3	7−8 −686%	55−60 +686%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −686%	110−120 +686%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
−700%

40−45

+700%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
−700%

24−27

+700%

This is how HD 7690M and T1000 compete in popular games:

T1000 is 700% faster in 900p
T1000 is 263% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.36	19.78
Recency	25 December 2011	6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	50 Watt

HD 7690M has 150% lower power consumption.

T1000, on the other hand, has a 738.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7690M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7690M is a notebook card while T1000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.