GeForce2 Ti vs Radeon HD 7690M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7690M with GeForce2 Ti, including specs and performance data.

HD 7690M
2011
1 GB DDR3, 20 Watt
2.03
+20200%

HD 7690M outperforms GeForce2 Ti by a whopping 20200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8581526
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.02no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameThamesNV15 A5
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date25 December 2011 (13 years ago)1 October 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speed725 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed725 MHzno data
Number of transistors716 million25 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate17.402.000
Floating-point processing power0.696 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)AGP 4x
Lengthno data165 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7690M 2.03
+20200%
GeForce2 Ti 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7690M 909
+22625%
GeForce2 Ti 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p25-0−1
Full HD18-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7 0−1
Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1
Valorant 40−45 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7 0−1
Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6 0−1
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Valorant 40−45 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Valorant 40−45 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22 0−1
Valorant 18−20 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 10−12 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.03 0.01
Recency 25 December 2011 1 October 2001
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

HD 7690M has a 20200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 7690M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce2 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7690M is a notebook card while GeForce2 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7690M
Radeon HD 7690M
NVIDIA GeForce2 Ti
GeForce2 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 10 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7690M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 17 votes

Rate GeForce2 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7690M or GeForce2 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.