Radeon 610M vs HD 7660G

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7660G and Radeon 610M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7660G
2012
35 Watt
1.23

610M outperforms HD 7660G by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1047789
Place by popularitynot in top-10050
Power efficiency2.4213.29
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameDevastatorDragon Range
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384128
Core clock speed686 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed686 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate16.4617.60
Floating-point processing power0.5268 TFLOPS0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs248
Ray Tracing Coresno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7660G 1.23
Radeon 610M 2.89
+135%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7660G 473
Radeon 610M 1111
+135%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7660G 1057
Radeon 610M 2863
+171%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7660G 4523
Radeon 610M 12065
+167%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 7660G 6409
Radeon 610M 13898
+117%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 7660G 65558
Radeon 610M 164666
+151%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p11
−118%
24−27
+118%
Full HD15
+15.4%
13
−15.4%
1200p9
−133%
21−24
+133%
1440p24−27
−154%
61
+154%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Elden Ring 0−1 5−6

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−138%
19
+138%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Dota 2 5
−100%
10
+100%
Elden Ring 0−1 5−6
Far Cry 5 9
−133%
21
+133%
Fortnite 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−75%
14
+75%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−1500%
16
+1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 11
−145%
27−30
+145%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
World of Tanks 39
−33.3%
50−55
+33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Dota 2 15
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−37.5%
11
+37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 2−3
World of Tanks 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Valorant 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 2−3
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Far Cry 5 0−1 3−4
Valorant 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Metro Exodus 16
+0%
16
+0%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Metro Exodus 11
+0%
11
+0%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Valorant 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Elden Ring 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Elden Ring 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how HD 7660G and Radeon 610M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 610M is 118% faster in 900p
  • HD 7660G is 15% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 610M is 133% faster in 1200p
  • Radeon 610M is 154% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7660G is 88% faster.
  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 610M is 1500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 7660G is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • Radeon 610M is ahead in 36 tests (73%)
  • there's a draw in 12 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.23 2.89
Recency 15 May 2012 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 610M has a 135% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 540% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 610M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7660G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7660G
Radeon HD 7660G
AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 135 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7660G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 803 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.