GeForce 9800M GS vs Radeon HD 7660G
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 7660G and GeForce 9800M GS, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
9800M GS outperforms HD 7660G by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1047 | 999 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 2.42 | 1.66 |
Architecture | TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
GPU code name | Devastator | G94 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 May 2012 (12 years ago) | 1 November 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 686 MHz | 530 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 686 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,303 million | 505 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 60 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 16.46 | 16.96 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.5268 TFLOPS | 0.1696 TFLOPS |
Gigaflops | no data | 254 |
ROPs | 8 | 16 |
TMUs | 24 | 32 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Bus support | no data | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 51.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Multi monitor support | no data | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Power management | no data | 8.0 |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | - | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 11
−9.1%
| 12−14
+9.1%
|
Full HD | 15
−6.7%
| 16−18
+6.7%
|
1200p | 9
−11.1%
| 10−12
+11.1%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Elden Ring | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Dota 2 | 5
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
Elden Ring | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Far Cry 5 | 9
−22.2%
|
10−12
+22.2%
|
Fortnite | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 11
−36.4%
|
14−16
+36.4%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 39
+30%
|
30−33
−30%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Dota 2 | 15
+650%
|
2−3
−650%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−10%
|
10−12
+10%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
1440p
High Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−28.6%
|
9−10
+28.6%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
World of Tanks | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Valorant | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
4K
High Preset
Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Valorant | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Full HD
High Preset
Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
Elden Ring | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
Elden Ring | 0−1 | 0−1 |
This is how HD 7660G and 9800M GS compete in popular games:
- 9800M GS is 9% faster in 900p
- 9800M GS is 7% faster in 1080p
- 9800M GS is 11% faster in 1200p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7660G is 650% faster.
- in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the 9800M GS is 100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- HD 7660G is ahead in 3 tests (7%)
- 9800M GS is ahead in 23 tests (56%)
- there's a draw in 15 tests (37%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.23 | 1.44 |
Recency | 15 May 2012 | 1 November 2008 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 60 Watt |
HD 7660G has an age advantage of 3 years, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 71.4% lower power consumption.
9800M GS, on the other hand, has a 17.1% higher aggregate performance score.
The GeForce 9800M GS is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7660G in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.